Carrier Grade Linux/Gaps Alpha1

[Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (MacDonald, Joe)]

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 09:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote:

> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:28:25AM -0600, Troy Heber wrote:
> > On 05/27/08 08:40, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I thought you all were moving away from the "accept a random feature
> > > requriement" to the more useful "accept a problem that needs to be
> > > solved" type model.
> > 
> > We are! And we are also trying to go through all of the old
> > requirements one by one and trying to reevaluate what we should do
> > with them.
> 
> I would suggest dropping them all, unless a real "gap and requirement"
> is specified for them.  That would be the simplest, and ensure that
> requirements that were actually needed would survive (if no one speaks
> up for one, it must not have been important.)

More than a year ago we eliminated most of the ones that didn't
specifically have a NEP requesting it.  And we're still trying to
eliminate the silly ones as we review them all (see: meetings next week,
or dial in to the LF CGL con call tomorrow) but it takes time and people
effort.

Joe MacDonald, Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct 613.270.5750  mobile 613.291.7421  fax 613.592.2283   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lf_carrier/attachments/20080527/13fb9d3a/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lf_carrier/attachments/20080527/13fb9d3a/attachment.pgp