Carrier Grade Linux/Gaps Alpha1

[greg@xxxxxxxxx (Greg KH)]

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:28:25AM -0600, Troy Heber wrote:
> On 05/27/08 08:40, Greg KH wrote:
> > I thought you all were moving away from the "accept a random feature
> > requriement" to the more useful "accept a problem that needs to be
> > solved" type model.
> 
> We are! And we are also trying to go through all of the old
> requirements one by one and trying to reevaluate what we should do
> with them.

I would suggest dropping them all, unless a real "gap and requirement"
is specified for them.  That would be the simplest, and ensure that
requirements that were actually needed would survive (if no one speaks
up for one, it must not have been important.)

thanks,

greg k-h