On 10/26/23 17:23, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 10/26/23 17:11, Ido Schimmel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:41:06PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
static const struct nla_policy netkit_policy[IFLA_NETKIT_MAX + 1] = {
[IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_INFO] = { .len = sizeof(struct
ifinfomsg) },
- [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_U32,
+ netkit_check_policy),
Nik, it's problematic to use NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN() with anything
other than NLA_BINARY. See commit 9e17f99220d1 ("net/sched: act_mpls:
Fix warning during failed attribute validation").
But how is that code called at all? The validation type is
NLA_VALIDATE_FUNCTION(), not NLA_VALIDATE_MIN/MAX/RANGE/RANGE_WARN...
nla_validate_int_range() is called only on:
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_PTR:
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE:
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG:
case NLA_VALIDATE_MIN:
case NLA_VALIDATE_MAX:
Ah, I'm looking at the wrong thing.. I saw the problem. :)
Anyway, I'll switch to NLA_BINARY in a bit to make sure it's ok. Thanks
for the pointer.
+ [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_U32,
+ netkit_check_mode),
+ [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_U32,
+ netkit_check_policy),
[IFLA_NETKIT_PRIMARY] = { .type = NLA_REJECT,
.reject_message = "Primary attribute is
read-only" },
};
--
2.38.1
