Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: Don't EFAULT for {g,s}setsockopt with wrong optlen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 3:00 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/4/23 11:43 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > optval larger than PAGE_SIZE leads to EFAULT if the BPF program
> > isn't careful enough. This is often overlooked and might break
> > completely unrelated socket options. Instead of EFAULT,
> > let's ignore BPF program buffer changes. See the first patch for
> > more info.
> >
> > In addition, clearly document this corner case and reset optlen
> > in our selftests (in case somebody copy-pastes from them).
>
> Looks good. A respin is needed to address the selftest issues. The bpf CI will
> help to confirm that.
>
> Looking forward to v5. Thanks.

Thank you for the review, will take a look! The part about endianness
is surprising. Existing cases don't care because they are 1 byte; the
new ones are 4 and should, in theory, need the flipping.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux