Re: [PATCH bpf-next V2 3/6] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata RX hash return code info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 22/03/2023 20.33, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:30 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:23 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:17 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:00 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:07 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<jbrouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 21/03/2023 19.47, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 6:47 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When driver developers add XDP-hints kfuncs for RX hash it is
practical to print the return code in bpf_printk trace pipe log.

Print hash value as a hex value, both AF_XDP userspace and bpf_prog,
as this makes it easier to spot poor quality hashes.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  |    9 ++++++---
   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c      |    5 ++++-
   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index 40c17adbf483..ce07010e4d48 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -77,10 +77,13 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
                  meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
          }

-       if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash))
-               bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with %u", meta->rx_hash);
-       else
+       ret = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash);
+       if (ret >= 0) {
+               bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with 0x%08X", meta->rx_hash);
+       } else {
+               bpf_printk("rx_hash not-avail errno:%d", ret);
                  meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
+       }

          return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS);
   }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index 400bfe19abfe..f3ec07ccdc95 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
   /* Reference program for verifying XDP metadata on real HW. Functional test
    * only, doesn't test the performance.
    *
+ * BPF-prog bpf_printk info outout can be access via
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe

s/outout/output/


Fixed in V3

But let's maybe drop it? If you want to make it more usable, let's
have a separate patch to enable tracing and periodically dump it to
the console instead (as previously discussed).

Cat'ing /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe work for me regardless of
setting in
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk/enable

We likely need a followup patch that adds a BPF config switch that can
disable bpf_printk calls, because this adds overhead and thus affects
the timestamps.

No. This is by design.
Do not use bpf_printk* in production.

I fully agree do not use bpf_printk in *production*.


But that's not for the production? xdp_hw_metadata is a small tool to
verify that the metadata being dumped is correct (during the
development).
We have a proper (less verbose) selftest in
{progs,prog_tests}/xdp_metadata.c (over veth).
This xdp_hw_metadata was supposed to be used for running it against
the real hardware, so having as much debugging at hand as possible
seems helpful? (at least it was helpful to me when playing with mlx4)

My experience when developing these kfuncs for igc (real hardware), this
"tool" xdp_hw_metadata was super helpful, because it was very verbose
(and I was juggling reading chip registers BE/LE and see patch1 a buggy
implementation for RX-hash).

As I wrote in cover-letter, I recommend other driver developers to do
the same, because it really help speed up the development. In theory
xdp_hw_metadata doesn't belong in selftests directory and IMHO it should
have been placed in samples/bpf/, but given the relationship with real
selftest {progs,prog_tests}/xdp_metadata.c I think it makes sense to
keep here.



The only use of bpf_printk is for debugging of bpf progs themselves.
It should not be used in any tool.

Hmm, good point. I guess it also means we won't have to mess with
enabling/dumping ftrace (and don't need this comment about cat'ing the
file).
Jesper, maybe we can instead pass the status of those
bpf_xdp_metadata_xxx kfuncs via 'struct xdp_meta'? And dump this info
from the userspace if needed.

There are so many other ways for bpf prog to communicate with user space.
Use ringbuf, perf_event buffer, global vars, maps, etc.
trace_pipe is debug only because it's global and will conflict with
all other debug sessions.

I want to highlight above paragraph: It is very true for production
code. (Anyone Googling this pay attention to above paragraph).


👍 makes sense, ty! hopefully we won't have to add a separate channel
for those and can (ab)use the metadata area.


Proposed solution: How about default disabling the bpf_printk's via a macro define, and then driver developer can manually reenable them easily via a single define, to enable a debugging mode.

I was only watching /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe when I was debugging a driver issue. Thus, an extra step of modifying a single define in BPF seems easier, than instrumenting my driver with printk.

--Jesper




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux