On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 21/03/2023 19.47, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 6:47 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer > > <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> When driver developers add XDP-hints kfuncs for RX hash it is > >> practical to print the return code in bpf_printk trace pipe log. > >> > >> Print hash value as a hex value, both AF_XDP userspace and bpf_prog, > >> as this makes it easier to spot poor quality hashes. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 9 ++++++--- > >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 5 ++++- > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> index 40c17adbf483..ce07010e4d48 100644 > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> @@ -77,10 +77,13 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > >> meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ > >> } > >> > >> - if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash)) > >> - bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with %u", meta->rx_hash); > >> - else > >> + ret = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash); > >> + if (ret >= 0) { > >> + bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with 0x%08X", meta->rx_hash); > >> + } else { > >> + bpf_printk("rx_hash not-avail errno:%d", ret); > >> meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ > >> + } > >> > >> return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS); > >> } > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> index 400bfe19abfe..f3ec07ccdc95 100644 > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > >> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ > >> /* Reference program for verifying XDP metadata on real HW. Functional test > >> * only, doesn't test the performance. > >> * > >> + * BPF-prog bpf_printk info outout can be access via > >> + * /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > > > > s/outout/output/ > > > > Fixed in V3 > > > But let's maybe drop it? If you want to make it more usable, let's > > have a separate patch to enable tracing and periodically dump it to > > the console instead (as previously discussed). > > Cat'ing /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe work for me regardless of > setting in > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk/enable > > We likely need a followup patch that adds a BPF config switch that can > disable bpf_printk calls, because this adds overhead and thus affects > the timestamps. No. This is by design. Do not use bpf_printk* in production.