On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:17 PM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:00 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:07 AM Alexei Starovoitov > > <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer > > > <jbrouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 21/03/2023 19.47, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 6:47 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer > > > > > <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> When driver developers add XDP-hints kfuncs for RX hash it is > > > > >> practical to print the return code in bpf_printk trace pipe log. > > > > >> > > > > >> Print hash value as a hex value, both AF_XDP userspace and bpf_prog, > > > > >> as this makes it easier to spot poor quality hashes. > > > > >> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > >> --- > > > > >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 9 ++++++--- > > > > >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 5 ++++- > > > > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > >> > > > > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> index 40c17adbf483..ce07010e4d48 100644 > > > > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> @@ -77,10 +77,13 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx) > > > > >> meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ > > > > >> } > > > > >> > > > > >> - if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash)) > > > > >> - bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with %u", meta->rx_hash); > > > > >> - else > > > > >> + ret = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash); > > > > >> + if (ret >= 0) { > > > > >> + bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with 0x%08X", meta->rx_hash); > > > > >> + } else { > > > > >> + bpf_printk("rx_hash not-avail errno:%d", ret); > > > > >> meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */ > > > > >> + } > > > > >> > > > > >> return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS); > > > > >> } > > > > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> index 400bfe19abfe..f3ec07ccdc95 100644 > > > > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c > > > > >> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ > > > > >> /* Reference program for verifying XDP metadata on real HW. Functional test > > > > >> * only, doesn't test the performance. > > > > >> * > > > > >> + * BPF-prog bpf_printk info outout can be access via > > > > >> + * /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > > > > > > > > > > s/outout/output/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed in V3 > > > > > > > > > But let's maybe drop it? If you want to make it more usable, let's > > > > > have a separate patch to enable tracing and periodically dump it to > > > > > the console instead (as previously discussed). > > > > > > > > Cat'ing /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe work for me regardless of > > > > setting in > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk/enable > > > > > > > > We likely need a followup patch that adds a BPF config switch that can > > > > disable bpf_printk calls, because this adds overhead and thus affects > > > > the timestamps. > > > > > > No. This is by design. > > > Do not use bpf_printk* in production. > > > > But that's not for the production? xdp_hw_metadata is a small tool to > > verify that the metadata being dumped is correct (during the > > development). > > We have a proper (less verbose) selftest in > > {progs,prog_tests}/xdp_metadata.c (over veth). > > This xdp_hw_metadata was supposed to be used for running it against > > the real hardware, so having as much debugging at hand as possible > > seems helpful? (at least it was helpful to me when playing with mlx4) > > The only use of bpf_printk is for debugging of bpf progs themselves. > It should not be used in any tool. Hmm, good point. I guess it also means we won't have to mess with enabling/dumping ftrace (and don't need this comment about cat'ing the file). Jesper, maybe we can instead pass the status of those bpf_xdp_metadata_xxx kfuncs via 'struct xdp_meta'? And dump this info from the userspace if needed.