On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 17:13, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> net/bpf/test_run.c is already presenting 20 kfuncs.
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c is also presenting an extra 10 kfuncs.
>
> Given that all the kfuncs are regrouped into one unique set, having
> only 2 space left prevent us to add more selftests.
>
> Bump it to 64 for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
I can imagine pinning this down as the reason the program was failing
to load must have been fun, since I ended up requiring this too in the
linked list series...
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> no changes in v11
>
> new in v10
> ---
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index eca9ea78ee5f..8280c1a8dbce 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum btf_kfunc_hook {
> };
>
> enum {
> - BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 32,
> + BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 64,
> BTF_DTOR_KFUNC_MAX_CNT = 256,
> };
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>
