Hi, well, given that the HID changes haven't moved a lot in the past revisions and that I am cc-ing a bunch of people, I have dropped them while we focus on the last 2 requirements in bpf-core changes. I'll submit a HID targeted series when we get these in tree, which would make things a lore more independent. For reference, the whole reasons for these 2 main changes are at https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902132938.2409206-1-benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx/ Compared to v10 (in addition of dropping the HID changes), I have changed the selftests so we can test both light skeletons and libbbpf calls. Cheers, Benjamin Benjamin Tissoires (7): selftests/bpf: regroup and declare similar kfuncs selftests in an array bpf: split btf_check_subprog_arg_match in two bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type bpf/btf: bump BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 + include/linux/btf.h | 10 + kernel/bpf/btf.c | 149 ++++++++++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 66 +++-- net/bpf/test_run.c | 37 +++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 5 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c | 160 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 71 ++++++ 10 files changed, 678 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c -- 2.36.1
