Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 11:01 AM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:50:49 +0000
>
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:44 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Please do not send encrypted patches.
> > Use plain text.
>
> Oof, weird. I use ProtonMail Bridge and they claim it doesn't
> encrypt mails to non-Proton users. That's the first time I hear
> such, I was sending several fixes to LKML a couple weeks ago
> from this mail address with no issues (and got them accepted).

They come encrypted to gmail inbox. Shrug.

> >
> > Also for bpf fixes please use [PATCH bpf] subject.
>
> I decided to go with bpf-next since it changes the layout of
> &perf_event a bit when !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS. But if you're okay
> with taking this through the bpf tree, it's even better.

I didn't see the patches. Only went with 'unpopular fixes' subject.
If they're not then bpf-next is certainly better.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux