Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:50:49 +0000

> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:44 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> Please do not send encrypted patches.
> Use plain text.

Oof, weird. I use ProtonMail Bridge and they claim it doesn't
encrypt mails to non-Proton users. That's the first time I hear
such, I was sending several fixes to LKML a couple weeks ago
from this mail address with no issues (and got them accepted).

>
> Also for bpf fixes please use [PATCH bpf] subject.

I decided to go with bpf-next since it changes the layout of
&perf_event a bit when !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS. But if you're okay
with taking this through the bpf tree, it's even better.

> cc maintainers and bpf@vger only.
> There is no need to spam such a huge list of people.

I usually redirect scripts/get_maintainers.pl to git-send-email
directly, but you're right, sure. Seems like it does overkills
sometimes.

Thanks,
Al





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux