Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:50:49 +0000
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220414223704.341028-1-alobakin@pm.me>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:44 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> wrote:

Please do not send encrypted patches.
Use plain text.

Also for bpf fixes please use [PATCH bpf] subject.
cc maintainers and bpf@vger only.
There is no need to spam such a huge list of people.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)
  - From: Alexander Lobakin

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)
  - From: Alexander Lobakin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 11/11] samples: bpf: xdpsock: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux