RE: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/2] Add skb_store_bytes() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 12:38 PM
> To: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tyler Wear (QUIC) <quic_twear@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Network Development
> <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Yonghong Song
> <yhs@xxxxxx>; Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>; Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Song Liu
> <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/2] Add skb_store_bytes() for
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB
> 
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary
> of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > This is wrong.
> > > > > > CGROUP_INET_EGRESS bpf prog cannot arbitrary change packet
> data.
> >
> > I agree with this sentiment, which is why the original proposal was
> > simply to add a helper which is only capable of modifying the
> > tos/tclass/dscp field, and not any arbitrary bytes.  (note: there
> > already is such a helper to set the ECN congestion notification bits,
> > so there's somewhat of a precedent)
> 
> True. bpf_skb_ecn_set_ce() is available to cg_skb progs.
> An arbitrary tos rewriting helper would screw it up.

Patch 1 was for a ds_field helper to modify the top 6 bits of TOS, not an arbitrary rewriting.
This should suffice since it doesn't interfere with CE.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux