Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2 v2] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2021/10/20 1:02 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:23 AM Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> On 10/19/21 9:46 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:14 AM Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +       sockaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
>>>> +       strcpy(sockaddr.sun_path, sock_path);
>>>
>>> please use strncpy.
>>
>> Will do.
> 
> please also run checkpatch.pl and confirm you haven't introduced new
> styling issues. As one example (and please fix this up in the next
> revision), you are using C++-style comments.
> 

Thanks, Andrii.

Forgot to run checkpatch scripts before sending the email.
Will do that in future patches.

>>
>>>
>>>> +       len = sizeof(sockaddr);
>>>> +       unlink(sock_path);
>>>
>>> please use abstract socket to avoid unlink and potential race.
>>>
>>
>> Will switch to abstract socket and update the BPF program.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux