Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: relicense bpf_insn.h as GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 13:26 +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 13:01 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:44, Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Gentle ping. Björn and Joe, would be great to hear from you on the
> > > > above. TIA!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Luca, apologies for the slow response. I'm no longer at Intel, and I'm
> > > not sure if an Intel-person needs to do anything? Magnus, do you know?
> > > 
> > > FWIW:
> > > Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > No worries! Unless you had an arrangement in place that made you the
> > copyright owner of that contribution (eg: it was done in spare time,
> > etc), then yes we'd need an ack to the relicense from an intel.com
> > email address to be above board.
> 
> Will this do?
> 
> Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>

Good enough for me, thank you!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux