Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: relicense bpf_insn.h as GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 13:01 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:44, Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > 
> > Gentle ping. Björn and Joe, would be great to hear from you on the
> > above. TIA!
> > 
> 
> Luca, apologies for the slow response. I'm no longer at Intel, and I'm
> not sure if an Intel-person needs to do anything? Magnus, do you know?
> 
> FWIW:
> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>

No worries! Unless you had an arrangement in place that made you the
copyright owner of that contribution (eg: it was done in spare time,
etc), then yes we'd need an ack to the relicense from an intel.com
email address to be above board.

John, is this something you could help with, using your manager hat?
Full context:

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210923000540.47344-1-luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux