Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: relicense bpf_insn.h as GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 13:01 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:44, Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > Gentle ping. Björn and Joe, would be great to hear from you on the
> > > above. TIA!
> > >
> >
> > Luca, apologies for the slow response. I'm no longer at Intel, and I'm
> > not sure if an Intel-person needs to do anything? Magnus, do you know?
> >
> > FWIW:
> > Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> No worries! Unless you had an arrangement in place that made you the
> copyright owner of that contribution (eg: it was done in spare time,
> etc), then yes we'd need an ack to the relicense from an intel.com
> email address to be above board.

Will this do?

Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>

> John, is this something you could help with, using your manager hat?
> Full context:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210923000540.47344-1-luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux