On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- > > v2: Rebase on latest net-next > > Make the code more complete (but still incomplete) > > What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored? They are not ignored for two reasons: 1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly you missed them. 2) I also responded in changelog, please check the difference, clearly V2 is much more lengthy than V1. It becomes clear you ignored mine (either email or changelog), not vice versa. Please lead by examples, you are not actually following anything you ask others to do. Remember the last time I asked you to expand your changelog for bpf timer? You kept ignoring it. ;) Thanks.
