On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:59 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov > <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- > > > v2: Rebase on latest net-next > > > Make the code more complete (but still incomplete) > > > > What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored? > > They are not ignored for two reasons: > > 1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly > you missed them. Multiple people in the v1 thread made it clear that the approach presented in v1 is not generic enough. v2 made no attempt to address these concerns.
