Re: [PATCH 1/1] libbpf: Delete an unneeded bool conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:14:00AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/5/13 3:02, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:09 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:00:29AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:43 AM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The result of an expression consisting of a single relational operator is
> >>>> already of the bool type and does not need to be evaluated explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> No functional change.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>
> >>> See [0] and [1].
> >>>
> >>>   [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYgLf5g3oztbA-CJR4gQ7AVKQAGrsHWCOgTtUMUM-Mxfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZQ6=-h3g1duXFwDLr92z7nE6ajv8Rz_Zv=qx=-F3sRVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> How long do you plan to fight with such patches?
> > 
> > As long as necessary. There are better ways to contribute to libbpf
> > than doing cosmetic changes to the perfectly correct code.
> 
> No small stream, no river and sea.
> 
> There are no improvements to functionality, but may slightly speed up compilation.
> With more such accumulations, it is possible that the compilation of allmodconfig
> results in a second-level improvement.

Unlikely with modern CPUs.

> 
> I don't know if you agree, at least I think so.
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >>>> index e2a3cf4378140f2..fa02213c451f4d2 100644
> >>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >>>> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int set_kcfg_value_tri(struct extern_desc *ext, void *ext_val,
> >>>>                                 ext->name, value);
> >>>>                         return -EINVAL;
> >>>>                 }
> >>>> -               *(bool *)ext_val = value == 'y' ? true : false;
> >>>> +               *(bool *)ext_val = value == 'y';
> >>>>                 break;
> >>>>         case KCFG_TRISTATE:
> >>>>                 if (value == 'y')
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd
> >>>>
> >>>>
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux