Re: [PATCH 1/1] libbpf: Delete an unneeded bool conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:00:29AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:43 AM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The result of an expression consisting of a single relational operator is
> > already of the bool type and does not need to be evaluated explicitly.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> See [0] and [1].
> 
>   [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYgLf5g3oztbA-CJR4gQ7AVKQAGrsHWCOgTtUMUM-Mxfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZQ6=-h3g1duXFwDLr92z7nE6ajv8Rz_Zv=qx=-F3sRVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

How long do you plan to fight with such patches?

Thanks

> 
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index e2a3cf4378140f2..fa02213c451f4d2 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int set_kcfg_value_tri(struct extern_desc *ext, void *ext_val,
> >                                 ext->name, value);
> >                         return -EINVAL;
> >                 }
> > -               *(bool *)ext_val = value == 'y' ? true : false;
> > +               *(bool *)ext_val = value == 'y';
> >                 break;
> >         case KCFG_TRISTATE:
> >                 if (value == 'y')
> > --
> > 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd
> >
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux