Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 20:06, Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 26/03/2020 19:40, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > At this point I don't believe in your good intent.
> > Your repeated attacks on BPF in every thread are out of control.
> > I kept ignoring your insults for long time, but I cannot do this anymore.
> > Please find other threads to contribute your opinions.
> > They are not welcomed here.
> Given that this clearly won't land in this cycle (and neither will bpf_link
>  for XDP), can I suggest thateveryone involved steps back from the subject
>  for a few days to let tempers cool?  It's getting to the point where people
>  are burning bridges and saying things they might regret.
> I know everyone is under a lot of stress right now.

Sorry, I hadn't seen this message before sending my reply. I think
this sounds like a good idea.

-- 
Lorenz Bauer  |  Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK

www.cloudflare.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux