Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/03/2020 19:40, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> At this point I don't believe in your good intent.
> Your repeated attacks on BPF in every thread are out of control.
> I kept ignoring your insults for long time, but I cannot do this anymore.
> Please find other threads to contribute your opinions.
> They are not welcomed here.
Given that this clearly won't land in this cycle (and neither will bpf_link
 for XDP), can I suggest thateveryone involved steps back from the subject
 for a few days to let tempers cool?  It's getting to the point where people
 are burning bridges and saying things they might regret.
I know everyone is under a lot of stress right now.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux