On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:13:23PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > Now for XDP. It has same flawed model. And even if it seems to you > > that it's not a big issue, and even if Jakub thinks we are trying to > > solve non-existing problem, it is a real problem and a real concern > > from people that have to support XDP in production with many > > More than happy to talk to those folks, and see the tickets. Jakub, you repeatedly demonstrated lack of understanding of what bpf_link is despite multiple attempts from me, Andrii and others. At this point I don't believe in your good intent. Your repeated attacks on BPF in every thread are out of control. I kept ignoring your insults for long time, but I cannot do this anymore. Please find other threads to contribute your opinions. They are not welcomed here. > > well-meaning developers developing BPF applications independently. > > There is one single program which can be attached to the XDP hook, > the "everybody attaches their program model" does not apply. > > TW agent should just listen on netlink notifications to see if someone > replaced its program. This is dumbest idea I've heard in a long time. May be kernel shouldn't have done ACLs and did notifications only when file is accessed by a task that shouldn't have accessed it? Same level of craziness.
