On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 11:56:30AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:55:18PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > > How about for_each_node_state_by_dist()? It's essentialy a variant of > > for_each_node_state(), as it also accepts a state, with the only difference > > that node IDs are returned in increasing distance order. > > Sounds fine by me. Yury? for_each_node_numadist() maybe? Whichever you choose is good to me.
