On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:55:18PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > How about for_each_node_state_by_dist()? It's essentialy a variant of > for_each_node_state(), as it also accepts a state, with the only difference > that node IDs are returned in increasing distance order. Sounds fine by me. Yury? Thanks. -- tejun