Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING

[Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:14 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:40:42 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > I wonder if we need a separate cleanup after this series about moving
> > this kind of functions into net/core/timestamping.c, say,
> > __skb_tstamp_tx()?
>
> IMHO no need to go too far, just move the one function as part of this
> series. The only motivation is to avoid adding includes to
> linux/skbuff.h since skbuff.h is included in something like 8k objects.

Thanks for clarifying. Will do it in the re-spin.

Thanks,
Jason