Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:40:42 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> I wonder if we need a separate cleanup after this series about moving
> this kind of functions into net/core/timestamping.c, say,
> __skb_tstamp_tx()?

IMHO no need to go too far, just move the one function as part of this
series. The only motivation is to avoid adding includes to
linux/skbuff.h since skbuff.h is included in something like 8k objects.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux