On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 02:30:17 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
> struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> - struct sock *sk, int tstype)
> + struct sock *sk, bool sw, int tstype)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> bool tsonly, opt_stats = false;
> @@ -5551,6 +5576,9 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> if (!sk)
> return;
>
> + if (!skb_enable_app_tstamp(orig_skb, tstype, sw))
maybe keep the order of @tstype vs @sw consistent?
