Re: [RFC bpf-next 01/11] bpf: use branch predictions in opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 16:17 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

[...]

> This true/false logic seems generally useful not just for this use
> case, is there anything wrong with landing it? Seems pretty
> straightforward. I'd split it from the kfunc inlining and land
> independently.

I don't see anything wrong with it, but Alexei didn't like it.
Agree with your comment about organizing flags as bit-fields.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux