Re: [RFC bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: tests to verify handling of inlined kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 14:19 -0800, Jeff Johnson wrote:

[...]

> Does bpf_testmod.c already have a MODULE_LICENSE(). If so, then I'd drop the
> extra one in test_inlinable_kfuncs.c.

It does, will drop the license line from test_inlinable_kfuncs.c.

> My reviews on this subject are triggered by the lore search pattern:
> MODULE_LICENSE AND NOT MODULE_DESCRIPTION
> 
> Since it is expected that the two should appear together.

Understood, thank you for explaining.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux