Re: [RFC bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: tests to verify handling of inlined kfuncs

[Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/7/24 09:50, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d8b90ee7f2b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
...
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");

Since commit 1fffe7a34c89 ("script: modpost: emit a warning when the
description is missing"), a module without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION() will
result in a warning when built with make W=1. Not sure if this is
applicable to your new module, but if so, please add the missing
MODULE_DESCRIPTION().