On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:59:26PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote: > On 02/09/2024 15:08, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:34:40PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote: > >> On 30/08/2024 23:20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 1:49 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:56:08AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > >>>> +++ b/lib/bpf > >>>> @@ -1 +1 @@ > >>>> -Subproject commit 6597330c45d185381900037f0130712cd326ae59 > >>>> +Subproject commit 686f600bca59e107af4040d0838ca2b02c14ff50 > >>>> ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ > > > >>>> Right? > > > >>> Yes, and I'm doing another Github sync today. > > > > So, I just commited this locally: > > > > ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ git show > > commit 5fd558301891d1c0456fcae79798a789b499c1f9 (HEAD -> master) > > Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Sep 2 11:05:06 2024 -0300 > > > > libbpf: Sync with master, i.e. what will become 1.5.0 > > > > To pick this distilled BPF fix: > > > > fe28fae57a9463fbf ("libbpf: Ensure new BTF objects inherit input endianness") > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/lib/bpf b/lib/bpf > > index 686f600bca59e107..caa17bdcbfc58e68 160000 > > --- a/lib/bpf > > +++ b/lib/bpf > > @@ -1 +1 @@ > > -Subproject commit 686f600bca59e107af4040d0838ca2b02c14ff50 > > +Subproject commit caa17bdcbfc58e68eaf4d017c058e6577606bf56 > > ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ > > > > Ack? > > > > Acked-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > > My patch for the same change crossed with your email [1], just ignore > it. Thanks! I dropped mine and picked yours :-) Thanks! - Arnaldo > Alan > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20240902141043.177815-1-alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > >>> Separate question, I think pahole supports the shared library version > >>> of libbpf, as an option, is that right? How do you guys handle missing > >>> APIs for distilled BTF in such a case? > > > >> Good question - at present the distill-related code is conditionally > >> compiled if LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION >=1 and LIBBF_MINOR_VERSION >= 5; so if > >> an older shared library libbpf+headers is used, the btf_feature is > >> simply ignored as if we didn't know about it. See [1] for the relevant > >> code in btf_encoder.c. This problem doesn't arise if we're using the > >> synced libbpf. > > > >> There might be a better way to handle this, but I think that's enough to > >> ensure we avoid compilation failures at least. > > > > I guess this is good enough, > > > > - Arnaldo > > > >> [1] > >> https://github.com/acmel/dwarves/blob/fd14dc67cb6aaead553074afb4a1ddad10209892/btf_encoder.c#L1766