Re: FYI: CI regression on big-endian arch (s390) after recent pahole changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 1:49 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:56:08AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 6:19 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
> > > > Arnaldo: apologies but I think we'll either need to back out the
> > > > distilled stuff for 1.28 or have a new libbpf resync that captures the
> > > > fixes for endian issues once they land. Let me know what works best for
> > > > you. Thanks!
> > >
> > > It was useful, we got it tested more widely and caught this one.
> > >
> > > Andrii, what do you think? Can we get a 1.5.1 with this soon so that we
> > > do a resying in pahole and then release 1.28?
> >
> > Did you mean 1.4.6? We haven't released v1.5 just yet.
> >
> > But yes, I'm going to cut a new set of bugfix releases to libbpf
> > anyways, there is one more skeleton-related fix I have to backport.
> >
> > So I'll try to review, land, and backport the fix ASAP.
>
> Well, Alan sent patches updating libbpf to 1.5.0, so I misunderstood, I
> think he meant what is to become 1.5.0, so even better, I think its just
> a matter of updating the submodule sha:
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ git show b6def578aa4a631f870568e13bfd647312718e7f
> commit b6def578aa4a631f870568e13bfd647312718e7f
> Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Jul 29 12:13:16 2024 +0100
>
>     pahole: Sync with libbpf-1.5
>
>     This will pull in BTF support for distilled base BTF.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Cc: dwarves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729111317.140816-2-alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx
>     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/lib/bpf b/lib/bpf
> index 6597330c45d18538..686f600bca59e107 160000
> --- a/lib/bpf
> +++ b/lib/bpf
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -Subproject commit 6597330c45d185381900037f0130712cd326ae59
> +Subproject commit 686f600bca59e107af4040d0838ca2b02c14ff50
> ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$
>
> Right?

Yes, and I'm doing another Github sync today.

Separate question, I think pahole supports the shared library version
of libbpf, as an option, is that right? How do you guys handle missing
APIs for distilled BTF in such a case?

>
> - Arnaldo





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux