Re: [RFC bpf-next] bpf: avoid clang-specific push/pop attribute pragmas in bpftool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:10 PM Jose E. Marchesi
<jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 23:09 +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I have sent a tentative patch that adds the `record_attrs_str'
> >> configuration parameter to the btf_dump_opts, incorporating a few
> >> changes after Eduard's suggestions regarding avoiding double negations
> >> and docstrings.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I am not familiar with the particular use cases, but generally speaking
> >> separating sorting and emission makes sense to me.  I would also prefer
> >> that to iterators.
> >
> > Hi Jose,
> >
> > I've discussed this issue with Andrii today,
> > and we decided that we want to proceed with API changes,
> > that introduce two functions: one for sorting ids,
> > one for printing single type.
> >
> > I can do this change on Tue or Wed, if that is ok with you.
>
> Sure, thank you.

For now, for GCC-BPF-specific case we can add
-DBPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX in Makefile, if that's blocking GCC-BPF
effort.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux