Re: [RFC bpf-next] bpf: avoid clang-specific push/pop attribute pragmas in bpftool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 23:09 +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I have sent a tentative patch that adds the `record_attrs_str'
>> configuration parameter to the btf_dump_opts, incorporating a few
>> changes after Eduard's suggestions regarding avoiding double negations
>> and docstrings.
>
> [...]
>
>> I am not familiar with the particular use cases, but generally speaking
>> separating sorting and emission makes sense to me.  I would also prefer
>> that to iterators.
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> I've discussed this issue with Andrii today,
> and we decided that we want to proceed with API changes,
> that introduce two functions: one for sorting ids,
> one for printing single type.
>
> I can do this change on Tue or Wed, if that is ok with you.

Sure, thank you.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux