Re: [RFC bpf-next] bpf: avoid clang-specific push/pop attribute pragmas in bpftool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 23:09 +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:

[...]

> I have sent a tentative patch that adds the `record_attrs_str'
> configuration parameter to the btf_dump_opts, incorporating a few
> changes after Eduard's suggestions regarding avoiding double negations
> and docstrings.

[...]

> I am not familiar with the particular use cases, but generally speaking
> separating sorting and emission makes sense to me.  I would also prefer
> that to iterators.

Hi Jose,

I've discussed this issue with Andrii today,
and we decided that we want to proceed with API changes,
that introduce two functions: one for sorting ids,
one for printing single type.

I can do this change on Tue or Wed, if that is ok with you.

Thanks,
Eduard





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux