Re: Snap, Flatpak and/or AppImages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Another thing I see with appImage files is that if they need configurations, they are stored in the location where I expect them to be. In other words, I downloaded the subsurface appImage that they link to from the website, made it executable, in this case by ticking the execute checkbox under the permissions tab in the file's properties window, but chmod will do just as well for that, then ran the file. I got an accessible pop-up window right away asking if I wanted to keep checking for updates every two weeks, and in spite of the fact that I didn't even know how to use the application, it seems it just worked fine and didn't break accessibility in any way. It does have a configuration folder that it uses, and I can see that it stored it in ~/.subsurface, just as I expected. This has to be the best way for developers to build their application for multiple distributions, and it also has to be one of the easiest methods I've seen for downloading an application direct from the author's website and just getting it running without any hassle. I do have to wonder if the tools used for making these appImages are available for ARM-based computers like my router, my Odroid N2 and my Raspberry Pi. For now, this is what would make Flatpak most attractive, since even though it has central package repositories, Flatpaks can usually run on just about anything that has a packaged version of the Flatpak system.

~Kyle

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]