sorry, typing with my nose a bit.
Indeed I mean Web Content Access Guidelines 2.0 thanks for this article
too.
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
I posted a link to this article in response to another post, but a web search
will result in a lot of other articles:
https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/1/20750913/dominos-pizza-website-accessible-blind-supreme-court-lawsuit
BTW, do you mean WCAG 2.0 instead of WACG 2.0? I just want to make sure I'm
not missing something. I also did just realize that I was mistakenly
referring to it as WCAD, so sorry for any confusion.
--
Christopher (CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail
On 8/25/19 6:32 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
really?
Can you direct me to any press on this? why them and not pizza hut or
paypal or another company? Is the access rooted in wacg 2.0? or the
far less productive focus on a specific access tool, a concept which
itself violates wacg 2.0?
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> And yet Domino's is being sued because their web site and app is not
> accessible.
>
>
> I agree with you but that doesn't mean law suits should never be filed.
>
>
> --
> Christopher (CJ)
> Chaltain at Gmail
>
>
> On 8/25/19 4:21 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> > The problem is most of us don't have money to hire lawyers. You'd be
> > amazed how many people are screwed over, shoved aside and ignored
> > because
> > they lack the money, connections and clout to do anything. Companies
> > aren't going to listen to a few, or even a few hundred customers,
> > unless
> > there's a clear advantage for them. That's why a lot of these
> > complaints
> > never go anywhere.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 16:18:37 -0500
> > Subject: Re: amazon?
> >
> > > I agree litigation should be a final step, but there are also
> > certain
> > sections of the blindness community who don't think law suits should
> > ever be used, and IMHO, this is just another extreme that should be
> > avoided. If a company isn't following the law, and nothing else is
> > working, then law suits are a perfectly reasonable tool.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blinux-list mailing list
> > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
> --
> Christopher (CJ)
> Chaltain at Gmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
--
Christopher (CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list