Re: Blind vs. mainstream distros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Regarding my experiences with my clients, my business motto has always been "Linux is for everyone," and I don't discriminate. This means that I will never make it a policy to serve only blind or visually impaired people, and I prefer what are commonly called "mainstream" distros over all else. In fact, I have worked more with users with eyeballs, installing and supporting traditional distros, than I have with blind or visually impaired people, except maybe the support work I've done pro bono on various e-mail lists and IRC channels. But after much discussion between the Vinux and Sonar developers, it was felt that something specialized is still needed *for now*, but that working as close as possible to upstream is equally important, as the closer we are to upstream, the easier it will be to get bugs fixed and features added that will help everyone no matter which distro they choose, and eventually, no matter how old the packages are in the distro they choose. Also, working as closely as possible with upstream will mean less work that needs to be done to finally get to the point where only things like TalkingArch, which require very little time or effort, will be needed in the not-too-distant future, and hopefully there will come a day when none of this is needed at all, as everything will come up speaking, brailling and whatever else out of the box, with a vare minimum of user intervention.
~Kyle

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]