Re: some bees nest stirring, was just how much can you do with?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also, I forgot to mention that I don't think DOS works very well with broadband, or at least I never got it to work. Even if you find a packet driver for your network card and actually get the Lynx port to work, you'll be limited to fairly slow download speeds just due to the fact that DOS has memory limitations and is not multitasking. A multitasking OS can dedicate a process just to downloading and has a lot better memory management. Where this applies to you is getting back to things like YouTube, where you really can't use a graphical browser in DOS and would need to download the video locally. Also, since the packet driver itself takes memory and Lynx uses quite a bit of memory, not to mention your screen reader needing a good chunk, you'll rapidly lock up your system just due to the 640 KB limitation. You can load some things in upper memory and some things run in protected mode, but TSRs don't as I understand it and the amount of upper memory is also limited due to DOS limitations. Taking the youtube-dl script, it requires Python. I think there might be an ancient version of Python for DOS, but it's probably too old to work, and again you're back to running out of memory as any modern interpreter will take a lot.

As a final note, if you ever get a modern machine with a plug and play network card, DOS won't work with it because it won't have a static IRQ.

On 3/5/2013 1:21 AM, Tony Baechler wrote:
OK, a couple of quick thoughts, based on my own experience. Yes, you can run
Lynx, etc from DOS. However, it's much, much slower and requires messin
around with packet drivers and dial-up networking. Linux has that built-in
automatically and almost always just works. I never got Lynx to run in plain
DOS because I couldn't find a packet driver and TCP/IP software for my
network card, which is one of the big reasons why I switched to Windows 98
and the command prompt. The second issue is that, due to DOS memory
limitations, the ports will have a lot less features unless they use djgpp
and a DOS extender to get around the 640 KB limit. That's called protected
mode and again, Linux doesn't have that limitation. Finally, Lynx at least
used direct screen writes, so Vocal-Eyes didn't automatically read the
screen without a set file. In Linux and Cygwin, it was able to read fine on
its own because it used BIOS writes. Lynx in Linux is literally at least
twice as fast as DOS as I'm sure you've seen from Shellworld.

On 3/4/2013 11:03 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Still if elinks and mplayer exist ported for DOS, why go through the extreme
mayhem of finding someone local enough to learn speakup and ora and so forth
to teach me in the first place?

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

--
Have a good day,
Tony Baechler
tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]