The original poster may have been justifiably concerned about being too specific, because of the outrageous criminal provisions of the DMCA, since this concerns a (ridiculously weak) technological copy protection measure. If I were to follow his advice (and I have NOT tried this), I would grep or search the source for a keyword like "lock", and read the commentary near the resulting lines, using common sense to comment out.... Knowledge of "C" may not be all that necessary. And I'm not going to look, or be more specific than that, because.... To the original poster: might that strategy work ok? Note that I am NOT advocating doing that, since by doing so, some list member might be in possession of illegal code and thereby become a criminal felon. That's what bad law does, and my inability to freely post about it is why it's also unconstitional, and a fundamental violation of human rights, regardless of any strained court interpretation. LCR On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Brent Harding wrote: > ... to unlock them? I don't know the least of C > anyway. The trace site ... -- L. C. Robinson reply to no_spam+munged_lcr@onewest.net.invalid People buy MicroShaft for compatibility, but get incompatibility and instability instead. This is award winning "innovation". Find out how MS holds your data hostage with "The *Lens*"; see "CyberSnare" at http://www.netaction.org/msoft/cybersnare.html