OK, so that's hosw Debian packages it. But there's but one lynx source tree. One compiles with the --with-ssl switch, or one does not. If that's worth two separate packages, I sure don't mind. But let's not call that two separate lynx distributions. It's time for this confusion to stop. Three years is enough. On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Cheryl Homiak wrote: > Yes there is such a thing as with and without ssl support. > On debian, you can get a lynx package or a lynx-ssl package. Only they used to > use different configuration files and now they don't. It's a conflict anyway; if > you install one, the other gets removed but the .cfg file stays the same. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 Chair, Accessibility SIG Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) http://www.openebook.org