Running a Linux Office

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janina and Others,
Thanks for the good suggestions. We will probably go with a server
eventually. The problem right now is money for a sufficiently powerful
computer and a bunch of disk drives. I might use Linux on my personal
machine, whatever the rest of the office uses, as long as I still have
access to Windows when needed.
John

Computers to Help People, Inc.
http://www.chpi.org
825 East Johnson; Madison, WI 53703


----- Original Message -----
From: "Janina Sajka" <janina@afb.net>
To: <blinux-list@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:27
Subject: Re: Running a Linux Office


> I think the advice to start with a linux server and run samba to serve
> Windows clients is the right approach. It lets your staff keep what they
> know how to use, while providing you substantial protection against the
> kind of problems you've just been wrestling with. Several points I'd like
> to recommend:
>
> 1.) Insist that your clients write their data files on the linux
> server. Do not allow, or strongly discourage writing files on C:>, in
> other words;
>
> 2.) Get several large hard disks--as needed--on the server, and keep a
> dd image of each workstation's C:> drive on the server. That way, should
> your clients ever become infected again, you simply need to dd the image
> back from the server to recreate a pristine Win client--and you lose no
> data because that's all on the server.
> In my ejxperience, it's far easier, and far quicker to simply restore a
> pristine computer than to sleuth around file by infected file. But the key
> to this strategy is the data. If that's on the workstation, you won't want
> to blow it away. That's why point 1 is so critical.
>
> The time to restore a workstation will be quite short, actually. If you do
> it over the net from the server, it will depend on your net connection
> speed. If you get some kind of hich-capacity media--like a scsi orb drive,
> for example, and the local cards to support this, you could go around to
> each workstation and restore more quickly. I think you could easily put
> back five client systems within an hour.
>
> I have been using this very strategy recently in building a new Win 98
> installation. I back it up, from time to time, using dd. Then, if my next
> software installas run me into trouble, i.e., start negatively affecting
> already installed software, I just step back using my dd image and take a
> different course toward my goal. This strategy gets me robust Win
> installations in the long run, that are relatively impervious to the kinds
> of problems you're experiencing, because they're not intended to be
> permanent.
>
>  On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rafael
> Skodlar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:51:36AM -0400, John J. Boyer wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > As it happens, we just got infected with the new worm. It propagated
over
> > > our network to four different computers. I've been steadily getting
sick of
> > > Windows, so now i'm wondering how hard it would be to convert a
five-person
> > > office from Windows to Linux. We must also be able to use DOS in
native
> > > mode.
> >
> > This is not an easy question because we don't know what kind of
> > applications you need to run the business. I would start with a server
and
> > Samba to have stable environment for printing, email, backup, or
anything
> > else.
> >
> > The most difficult part is the applications. Depending on what you do it
> > might be difficult to find the right software for the right price. For
> > general office work StarOffice is good enough and it will be even better
> > when 6.0 comes out. There are other similar office tools coming out in
the
> > near future.
> >
> > Another important issue is learning new tools to do the job. For
example,
> > learning Gimp for graphics manipulation, etc.
> >
> > You would need to install dosemu to run DOS programs in Linux. That is
> > critical since there is no guarantee it will work. There are still some
> > programs that might not work. Alternative would be VMWARE to run windows
> > programs inside Linux. The good thing about it is that you can roll back
> > to before the virus attack I believe.
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > > John
> > >
> > > Computers to Help People, Inc.
> > > http://www.chpi.org
> > > 825 East Johnson; Madison, WI 53703
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > Blinux-list@redhat.com
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]