Hi Oh well, I was only trying to prevent someone having a lot of hard work. So I guess that it is format c: /s. Pity it wasn't Linux, the solution would have been a lot simpler. -----Original Message----- From: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com [mailto:blinux-list-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Brent Harding Sent: 06 December 2001 04:11 To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: RE: Hello! Yes, I've just run sfc, no errors. At 08:56 PM 12/5/01 -0000, you wrote: >Hi > >In answer to your question there's a nice little utility call Batch 98, you >should find it on your 98 CD. However, have you tried running sfc? > >-----Original Message----- >From: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com >[mailto:blinux-list-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Brent Harding >Sent: 05 December 2001 18:57 >To: blinux-list@redhat.com >Subject: Re: Hello! > > >How did you install windows without sighted help? I think this system >almost needs a reinstall, getting registry problems that a demo of norton >utils won't fix. I'm getting illegal ops with kernel32. Is there a way of >doing it easy, or do you just know the install that well to tell what the >sequence is? By the way I use win-98 and rh 7.1. I do have a double talk pc >available, and an external dectalk express in my laptop case. >At 11:35 AM 12/5/01 -0500, you wrote: >>I have not been watching this thread but just tuned in and have some >>passages I want to respond to below with responses marked with dp: >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "John G. Heim (26 2-9887)" <jheim@doit.wisc.edu> >>To: <blinux-list@redhat.com> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:14 AM >>Subject: Re: Hello! >> >> >>At 04:41 PM 12/3/01 -0500, you wrote: >>>install. >>>May I now simply suggest that you are wrong if for no other reason than >>>that I blind person will be very hard pressed to install Windows at all >>>without assistance? >> >>I'm not sure what I said that you think this disproves. My point is that >>it >>takes more knowledge to run a linux machine than a Windows machine. I >>never >>said windows can be installed without sighted assistance. The original >>questioner doesn't have a speech synthesizer so he can't install either >>linux or windows without sighted assistance. >>dp: it is possible to install windows without sighted assistance but you >>need to know how to do it. I am not certain that this is the case with >>linux but would wager that if the propper planning were done and the >>propper scripts available, it could be. >> >>About six months ago, I had a lightning strike at my home and lost the >>hard >>drive on both my Windows 95 and linux 5.2 machines. I bought 2 new hard >>drives and got Windows millenium and red hat 7.1 from the university. >>Since >>I don't have a synthesizer, I needed sighted assistance for both >>installs. >>The linux install took a lot longer and took much more technical >>knowledge. >> >>But that's okay. Of course it takes more knowledge to install linux than >>windows millenium. Linux is way more powerful than windows millenium. >> >>dp: I take it that you mean that linux out of the box is way more >>powerful than windows millennium or any windows system for that matter >>and I won't take issue with that. I would say though that again, with >>propper nknow how, you can do anything in windows that you can do in >>linux I am a windows user but a linux fan by the way so I am not >>bashing linux but want to keep the record streight. >> >>Windows is "easier" mailnly because doesn't do as much as linux. A good >>example of this point is file permissions. Can you even set file >>permissions in windows millenium? It doesn't really matter because you >>don't need them anyway. >>dp: you can set file permissions but not in the way you think of file >>permissions. you can tell windows that you want files to behave in >>certain ways such as be hidden, system or read only files if you know >>how to do it. >> >>If you're going to use linux, you probably need to learn about file >>permissions. How hard is that? Well, for some people it might be hard. >> >>Comparing apples to oranges? Yes! In fact, that's partly my point. Linux >>does bzillions of things windows doesn't. That's why it takes so much >>more >>knowledge to use. If you're going to use linux, you should be prepared >>to >>go through the process of acquiring that knowledge. Not everybody is >>going >>to want to do that. >>dp: I'd like a list of things that windows does not do that linux does. >>I can find a way to do them. >> >>Note too that my own example is rather esoteric. Most machines come with >>Windows pre-installed. Even if you replace the hard drive, you can >>usually >>boot from the old one, install windows on the new one, and then reboot >>from >>the new one -- all without sighted assistance. >> >>dp: none the less, I have started from an oss less hd and installed >>windows from scratch with little to no sighted assistance and no screen >>reader. >> >>-- >>John G. Heim >>WiscINFO Customer Service Coordinator >>Division of Information Technology >>jheim@doit.wisc.edu >>608-262-9887 >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >>Blinux-list@redhat.com >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >>Blinux-list@redhat.com >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list