On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 17:36 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Now'also a good time to consider tagging efforts. I used to tag >> > compat-drivers releases to match the same next tag from linux-next as >> > we moved on with the only difference I used compat-drivers-2013-05-07 >> > dates instead of next-20130507 and I also added a -1 or -2 if I >> > bumped updates by sticking to the same linux-next target. >> > >> > Whatever we decide I'll just note that rel-html currently supports the >> > scheme of dates that are split. I'll still have to update rel-html to >> > support the project name change so perhaps its good for us to consider >> > the tag use / practice. To be clear I only added a signed tag if and >> > only if ckmake yielded good results on all supported kernels. Using >> > git describe you'd be able to easily get the target next release tag. >> > >> > Thoughts, preferences? >> >> Here's an example: >> >> linux-next based releases: >> * backports-20130408 -- first release based on next-20130408 >> * backports-20130408-2 -- update on the backports code still based >> on next-20130408 >> * etc >> >> linux-stable releases: >> >> * backports-v3.10 - based on vanilla Linus-blessed v3.10 >> * backports-v3.10-2 - update on the backports code still based on >> vanilla v3.10 >> * backports-v3.10.1 - based on vanila Greg-bless v3.10.1 >> * backports-v3.10.1-2 - update on the backports code still based on >> vanilla v3.10.1 >> >> Thoughts? I should note I tried to stick to v3.10-1 convention for the >> first release but it just totally slipped at times. > > I was kinda hoping you'd just clone my tree and push it somewhere else > as the canonical tree, note that I haven't put it up on kernel.org but > only my own website :-) Well I think you're a better software asshole than I am but I know you have bigger fish to fry so I was kind of expecting this. > And to be honest, I don't really care. Tagging is nice for users, but > doesn't affect me since the backports are another input for our work, we > don't really have any use for backport releases. I'll stick to what I propose suggest I hear otherwise then. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
