On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 17:36 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now'also a good time to consider tagging efforts. I used to tag > > compat-drivers releases to match the same next tag from linux-next as > > we moved on with the only difference I used compat-drivers-2013-05-07 > > dates instead of next-20130507 and I also added a -1 or -2 if I > > bumped updates by sticking to the same linux-next target. > > > > Whatever we decide I'll just note that rel-html currently supports the > > scheme of dates that are split. I'll still have to update rel-html to > > support the project name change so perhaps its good for us to consider > > the tag use / practice. To be clear I only added a signed tag if and > > only if ckmake yielded good results on all supported kernels. Using > > git describe you'd be able to easily get the target next release tag. > > > > Thoughts, preferences? > > Here's an example: > > linux-next based releases: > * backports-20130408 -- first release based on next-20130408 > * backports-20130408-2 -- update on the backports code still based > on next-20130408 > * etc > > linux-stable releases: > > * backports-v3.10 - based on vanilla Linus-blessed v3.10 > * backports-v3.10-2 - update on the backports code still based on > vanilla v3.10 > * backports-v3.10.1 - based on vanila Greg-bless v3.10.1 > * backports-v3.10.1-2 - update on the backports code still based on > vanilla v3.10.1 > > Thoughts? I should note I tried to stick to v3.10-1 convention for the > first release but it just totally slipped at times. I was kinda hoping you'd just clone my tree and push it somewhere else as the canonical tree, note that I haven't put it up on kernel.org but only my own website :-) And to be honest, I don't really care. Tagging is nice for users, but doesn't affect me since the backports are another input for our work, we don't really have any use for backport releases. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html