Re: [WIP] weston 6.0.0 sandbox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kurokawa-san,
The Wayland core libraries do not need to be updated; new versions of
Weston work with old versions of Wayland.

Cheers,
Daniel

On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 09:26 +0000, HARUNOBU KUROKAWA wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Jan-simon
> 
> Ok, I agree if there is no problem because it is small impact.
> 
> But I guess that the sandbox seems to take care of only Weston
> version and wayland-protocol[1], how about other libraries like
> wayland, in [2] ?
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://git.automotivelinux.org/AGL/meta-agl/commit/?h=sandbox/jsmoeller/weston6&id=ca5d7e3676b20613fdae9ff17748092f6523803f
> [2] 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-graphics/wayland
> 
> Best regards,
> Kurokawa.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: automotive-discussions-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <automotive-discussions-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
> > Behalf Of Daniel Stone
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:28 PM
> > To: stephane.desneux@xxxxxxx; Jan-Simon Moeller <
> > jsmoeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: AGL ml <automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re:  [WIP] weston 6.0.0 sandbox
> > 
> > Hi Stephane,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 09:45 +0200, Stephane Desneux wrote:
> > > There are 2 options here:
> > > 
> > > * have weston6 for HH
> > > * have weston6 for master (for further development)
> > > 
> > > Both can be achieved (or not depending on discussion :))
> > 
> > As Jan-Simon says, it would be pretty painful having a split world
> > between CES and post-CES development. Given the
> > magnitude of the transition, we want to be able to move sooner
> > rather than later.
> > 
> > > BTW, what are the core reasons to switch to weston6?
> > 
> > We have been doing heavy rework of Weston's API upstream after
> > Weston 5.0. It's not really possible to define a compositor
> > architecture like the one we have agreed on before Weston 6.0: it
> > would require an AGL- specific fork of Weston which
> > would then have to be reconciled later on. Forking Weston
> > completely, seems more difficult than just switching to a
> > different upstream version.
> > 
> > The changes included a rework of output configuration, exposing the
> > Weston configuration parser as external API, and
> > many more, which allow AGL to define its own window management as a
> > user of libweston. It also adds an extensible
> > debug/tracing infrastructure.
> > 
> > The changes between Weston 5.0 and 6.0 are quite minimal for
> > backends/BSPs. Whilst 4.0 to 5.0 was a huge change in
> > the backends, 5.0 to 6.0 is much smaller and so should be much
> > easier to port.
> > 
> > Given the above, we decided that the best thing to do was to update
> > to
> > 6.0 early, to avoid diverging between Halibut, the CES demo
> > (Halibut++), and Icefish.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > automotive-discussions mailing list
> > automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions

_______________________________________________
automotive-discussions mailing list
automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux