_______________________________________________Hi
I can’t understand why it was decided in toooo short time and no announcement about update Weston version.
Renesas (= SoC vender ) provides BSP that follows poky version and tested it. It means focus to Weston / gstreamer etc version.
This policy is based on rules that AGL is developing according to the "poky”.
Why do you choose the version of weston exceptionally? Is it in roadmap?
Actually, we has tried to run Weston 6.0 for internally. Basically no problem but it was no enough test.
Best regards.
Kurokawa.
From: automotive-discussions-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <automotive-discussions-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Jan-Simon Moeller
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 8:48 PM
To: AGL ml <automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [WIP] weston 6.0.0 sandbox
Hi !
During the F2F in Spain, we decided to uprev weston and wayland-protocols to enable the rewrite of WM/HS .
Here is a sandbox branch to try out the different MACHINES and fix issues:
repo init -b refs/sandbox/jsmoeller/weston6 -u https://gerrit.automotivelinux.org/gerrit/AGL/AGL-repo
repo sync --force-sync -d
So far building:
qemux86-64, intel-corei7-64, rpi3
WIP:
m3/h3 , beaglebone, dra7xx-evm
Please test and let me know.
Best,
Jan-Simon
automotive-discussions mailing list
automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions
_______________________________________________ automotive-discussions mailing list automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions
