Re: about the connection with afb-deamon

[<I37546_CHIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jose

Thanks for the caution.
We've also noticed that and try to design it as subscribing all events in each listener.
In our cases, we needn't to ignore special event.

BTW, do you also think this can be done by one connection?
I mean something like we can set several listeners to one connection, etc.

Thanks/BR
ChenWei
-----Original Message-----
From: José Bollo [mailto:jose.bollo@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 4:15 PM
To: I37546 Chin I
Cc: fulup.arfoll@xxxxxxx; loic.collignon@xxxxxxx; automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; I25461 Momiyama Yoshito
Subject: Re:  about the connection with afb-deamon

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:02:03 +0000
<I37546_CHIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jose
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> 
> Yes, we also tested the multi-connection and found it works well.
> We are very glad to consider other solutions if it is better.
> 
> In fact, we're considering cases that each event listener has its own
> instance. In that way, we think we need different connection to
> identify the listener.(using the "closure") If one connection could
> also do this, I think we can accept this.

Hi ChenWei,

If the idea is to manage several and different event subscriptions then
it is not possible with afb_ws_client_connect_wsj1. Subscriptions are
linked to connections.

Best regards
José

> 
> Thanks/BR
> ChenWei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: José Bollo [mailto:jose.bollo@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 6:54 PM
> To: I37546 Chin I
> Cc: josé bollo; Fulup Ar Foll; Loïc Collignon [ IoT.bzh ];
> automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; I25461 Momiyama
> Yoshito Subject: Re:  about the connection with
> afb-deamon
> 
> 2018-08-10 10:15 GMT+02:00  <I37546_CHIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi Jose  
> 
> Hi ChenWei,
> 
> > I have a question about connection with afb-deamon at APP side.
> > Is it possible that creating 2 or more connections(for e.g., by
> > afb_ws_client_connect_wsj1()) with same port/tokenID in one APP(I
> > mean one process)?  
> 
> I have never tried to do that since your question. So I tried and it
> works. But I guess that you already reached that conclusion.
> 
> > We have cases that APIs are called for different functions at same
> > time. I'd like to know if the reply from binder will be sent to the
> > right requester when we do this.  
> 
> Be aware that although opening many sockets works, it is not the
> prefered way to use libafbwsc. The underlying protocol allows
> interleaving of queries and responses and the the library already
> takes care of that feature. Then opening onlmy one socket should be
> enough even to handle several concurrent requests.
> 
> Nevertheless, I don't know your exact problem so I can not tell what
> is the best solution. Anyway both solutions work.
> 
> Best regards
> José
> 
> >
> > If there are any troubles with this, we will try to keep one
> > connection.
> >
> > Thanks/BR
> > ChenWei
> >  

_______________________________________________
automotive-discussions mailing list
automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions